The Alabama IVF Ruling: A Critical Analysis of Its Impact on Women’s Reproductive Rights, Autonomy, and the Underlying Patriarchal Influences.

Jennifer Hepton
4 min readFeb 28, 2024

--

My motherhood journey, marked by the hurdles of failed IVFs, miscarriages, stillbirth and a surrogacy, now confronts a new challenge with Alabama’s court ruling, compelling me to voice my struggle against the backdrop of pervasive patriarchal norms.

The recent ruling by the Alabama State Supreme Court, which decreed that frozen embryos are considered human beings and that their destruction could lead to wrongful death liabilities, has sent shockwaves through the reproductive rights landscape. This landmark decision not only disrupts the provision of In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) services but also poses profound questions about women’s reproductive rights, autonomy, and the pervasive influence of patriarchal values on legislative and judicial processes.

Hearing the news brought back memories of sitting in a fertility clinic, questioning why I couldn’t achieve what seems so natural for many other women — having a baby. I remember desperately listening to the doctor as he outlined what he believed was wrong with my body, all the while assuring my husband that his parts were functioning perfectly.

The emotional trauma that a woman deals with, from the inability to conceive to being told what is best for her body, is overwhelming. And now, this ruling from Alabama only confirms the profound lack of understanding and voice women have in their reproductive journey. At the heart of this controversy is the court’s decision to equate frozen embryos with living human beings, thereby extending the legal protection of personhood to a pre-implantation stage of development.

This interpretation has plunged Alabama’s fertility industry into chaos, with at least three providers halting some IVF services in the wake of the ruling. The immediate effect is a severe limitation on access to reproductive technologies that many couples rely on to start or grow their families. As Dr. Mamie McLean, whose clinic is among those affected, poignantly noted, there is a pressing call for the state “to provide immediate, complete, and permanent access to IVF care for the women and families of Alabama” (CNN). This situation underscores a critical infringement on women’s reproductive rights.

The ruling’s impact extends beyond the logistical hurdles of accessing IVF treatment; it strikes at the very core of women’s autonomy and consent. By imposing legal liabilities on the destruction of frozen embryos, the state effectively curtails women’s rights to make informed decisions about their reproductive health. This intrusion not only undermines the principle of bodily autonomy but also subjects women’s reproductive choices to the scrutiny and control of the state. The climate of fear and uncertainty among Alabama providers, as noted by Katie O’Connor, the director of federal abortion policy at the National Women’s Law Center, reflects a broader societal trend of eroding women’s autonomy in favor of a legalistic interpretation of life that fails to account for the complex realities of reproductive health and family planning (CNN).

When we were informed that our embryos were not viable, the one saving grace for me was knowing I wouldn’t have to endure the trauma of another miscarriage, and that we had clarity. Now, this form of solace is being stripped away from women.

The patriarchal underpinnings of this ruling are unmistakable. At its core, the decision to legislate the status of frozen embryos and to impose legal liabilities on those who seek to terminate them is a manifestation of patriarchal control over women’s bodies. This control is not merely about the embryos themselves but about asserting a moral and legal authority over women’s reproductive capabilities. Such decisions reflect a patriarchal ideology that prioritizes the potential for life over the lived experiences, rights, and autonomy of women. The ruling, therefore, can be seen as part of a larger pattern of patriarchal governance that seeks to regulate female sexuality and reproduction under the guise of protecting life.

The legislative responses to the crisis, while aimed at protecting IVF providers from criminal or civil liability, also reveal the complexities of navigating women’s reproductive rights in a patriarchally dominated legal and social framework. Alabama Republicans have introduced several bills aimed at safeguarding IVF services, yet these efforts stop short of addressing the fundamental issue of whether a frozen embryo is considered a human being. The proposed legislation, as detailed in the coverage, aims to provide “civil and criminal immunity to persons providing goods and services related to in vitro fertilization” without tackling the core issues of autonomy, consent, and the patriarchal control of women’s reproductive functions (CNN).

Moreover, the national conversation sparked by the Alabama ruling and the legislative efforts to protect IVF access reflect a broader struggle against patriarchal constraints on reproductive freedom. Democratic House Minority Leader Anthony Daniels’ introduction of bills to clarify the legal status of fertilized eggs and embryos outside the human uterus is a direct challenge to the patriarchal assumptions underpining the original ruling. However, as experts like Katie O’Connor have noted, any legislation is subject to interpretation by a Supreme Court that has already demonstrated a willingness to prioritize embryonic personhood over women’s rights.

In conclusion, the Alabama Supreme Court ruling on IVF and embryos represents a significant setback for women’s reproductive rights and autonomy. The legislative efforts to mitigate the ruling’s impact, while necessary, must also confront the underlying patriarchal values that seek to define and control the parameters of women’s reproductive freedom. Ultimately, the struggle for reproductive rights in Alabama and beyond is not merely about access to IVF or the legal status of embryos; it is about asserting women’s autonomy, dignity, and the right to make informed choices free from patriarchal oversight and control.

Throughout my IVF journey towards motherhood, there were numerous instances where I felt diminished, compelled to silence and gratitude, all the while feeling my autonomy and consent being eroded. Now, witnessing this unfold at a state/government level only confirms the patriarchal stronghold on women’s infertility issues.

Jenn

Writer + Facilitator + Advocate

[ writing a book about this ]

--

--

Jennifer Hepton

Freelance Writer + Facilitator discussing Trauma, Autonomy, Consent and Patriarchal grip on Infertility